<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Bloglogic.net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloglogic.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloglogic.net</link>
	<description>Big News from the Blogosphere</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 07:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Brushing Away The Mothballs by TDH</title>
		<link>http://www.bloglogic.net/2007/02/15/brushing-away-the-mothballs/#comment-2537</link>
		<dc:creator>TDH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloglogic.net/2007/02/15/brushing-away-the-mothballs/#comment-2537</guid>
		<description>Well, good luck then! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, good luck then! <img src='http://www.bloglogic.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Meet the New Rocketboom Anchor: Joanna Colan by Bourland.com &#187; Ze Frank vs RocketBoom: Decision goes to Andrew Baron of RocketBoom</title>
		<link>http://www.bloglogic.net/2006/07/07/meet-the-new-rocketboom-anchor-joanna-colan/#comment-2422</link>
		<dc:creator>Bourland.com &#187; Ze Frank vs RocketBoom: Decision goes to Andrew Baron of RocketBoom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloglogic.net/2006/07/07/meet-the-new-rocketboom-anchor-joanna-colan/#comment-2422</guid>
		<description>[...] In the departure of Amanda Congdon, I think he came out all the better with the hiring of the classy Joanna Colan, whom I personally prefer to Amanda, but that&#8217;s just me. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the departure of Amanda Congdon, I think he came out all the better with the hiring of the classy Joanna Colan, whom I personally prefer to Amanda, but that&#8217;s just me. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Meet the New Rocketboom Anchor: Joanna Colan by Chido</title>
		<link>http://www.bloglogic.net/2006/07/07/meet-the-new-rocketboom-anchor-joanna-colan/#comment-1023</link>
		<dc:creator>Chido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloglogic.net/2006/07/07/meet-the-new-rocketboom-anchor-joanna-colan/#comment-1023</guid>
		<description>Lovely smile, ain't they lucky!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovely smile, ain&#8217;t they lucky!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Pay Per Post Model getting Face Space - AGAIN! by sellsius° real estate blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Invasion of the Blogger Snatchers</title>
		<link>http://www.bloglogic.net/2006/06/30/the-pay-per-post-model-getting-face-space-again/#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>sellsius° real estate blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Invasion of the Blogger Snatchers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 04:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloglogic.net/2006/06/30/the-pay-per-post-model-getting-face-space-again/#comment-766</guid>
		<description>[...] Altough this idea is not &#8220;new&#8221; - read Bloglogic and Ensight - the idea resembles a PPC (Pay Per Click) type of advertising. By using PayPerPost, advertisers can target Niche blogs and a niche audience just like Google Ad Words or Adsense advertisers do. I don&#8217;t think that bloggers should accept money from someone to blog favorably about them, their product or their service. The blogger may lose credibility in some peoples&#8217; eyes if they find out what they are doing. The larger issue is what happens when someone pays a blogger to write an unfavorable post about a competitor? Will this pimped out blogger do it? Will they take a chance and burn someone for money? It&#8217;s a lot easier to write a fluff piece than it is to write a barn burner. I wonder if that issue has ever come up in PayPerPosts&#8217; short history? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Altough this idea is not &#8220;new&#8221; - read Bloglogic and Ensight - the idea resembles a PPC (Pay Per Click) type of advertising. By using PayPerPost, advertisers can target Niche blogs and a niche audience just like Google Ad Words or Adsense advertisers do. I don&#8217;t think that bloggers should accept money from someone to blog favorably about them, their product or their service. The blogger may lose credibility in some peoples&#8217; eyes if they find out what they are doing. The larger issue is what happens when someone pays a blogger to write an unfavorable post about a competitor? Will this pimped out blogger do it? Will they take a chance and burn someone for money? It&#8217;s a lot easier to write a fluff piece than it is to write a barn burner. I wonder if that issue has ever come up in PayPerPosts&#8217; short history? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Pay Per Post Model getting Face Space - AGAIN! by BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wanna buy an ad on my nose?</title>
		<link>http://www.bloglogic.net/2006/06/30/the-pay-per-post-model-getting-face-space-again/#comment-758</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wanna buy an ad on my nose?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 14:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloglogic.net/2006/06/30/the-pay-per-post-model-getting-face-space-again/#comment-758</guid>
		<description>[...] : Oh, and when you see hand-wringing about foolish marketers trying to buy posts on blogs, come back to this: They&#8217;re buying the most precious editorial and brand space from the big guys. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] : Oh, and when you see hand-wringing about foolish marketers trying to buy posts on blogs, come back to this: They&#8217;re buying the most precious editorial and brand space from the big guys. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Update: Amanda Quits / or is Fired From Rocketboom by duncanriley.com &#187; Rocketboom implodes like a North Korean Missle Test</title>
		<link>http://www.bloglogic.net/2006/07/05/amanda-quits-or-is-fired-from-rocketboom/#comment-757</link>
		<dc:creator>duncanriley.com &#187; Rocketboom implodes like a North Korean Missle Test</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 02:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloglogic.net/2006/07/05/amanda-quits-or-is-fired-from-rocketboom/#comment-757</guid>
		<description>[...] You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your ownsite. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your ownsite. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Pay Per Post Model getting Face Space - AGAIN! by M Freitas</title>
		<link>http://www.bloglogic.net/2006/06/30/the-pay-per-post-model-getting-face-space-again/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>M Freitas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 07:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloglogic.net/2006/06/30/the-pay-per-post-model-getting-face-space-again/#comment-717</guid>
		<description>Regardless of what people say during the Gnomedex (Techcrunch), the blogosphere *IS* an echo chamber. How many times have I seen a topic that was discussed at length and died, coming back six months later for someone that have "just found out about it", and then a legion of bloggers repeat the "discovery" as it was the latest truth. 

Really, I have more than 300 feeds in my RSS agregator, and I remove any feed that is just posting non-original things. 

As for the actual topic, it's easy: many times I read blogs that read as a newspaper. If it looks like a newspaper, it reads like a newspaper it must be a newspaper, ergo a journalist.

Lots of magazines and newspapers now have "bloggers". Those are the same guy who until three years ago were "columnists". Nothing changed, just a different name.

Real bloggers though should go for independence, clarity, fresh content. Not necessarily news, but content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless of what people say during the Gnomedex (Techcrunch), the blogosphere *IS* an echo chamber. How many times have I seen a topic that was discussed at length and died, coming back six months later for someone that have &#8220;just found out about it&#8221;, and then a legion of bloggers repeat the &#8220;discovery&#8221; as it was the latest truth. </p>
<p>Really, I have more than 300 feeds in my RSS agregator, and I remove any feed that is just posting non-original things. </p>
<p>As for the actual topic, it&#8217;s easy: many times I read blogs that read as a newspaper. If it looks like a newspaper, it reads like a newspaper it must be a newspaper, ergo a journalist.</p>
<p>Lots of magazines and newspapers now have &#8220;bloggers&#8221;. Those are the same guy who until three years ago were &#8220;columnists&#8221;. Nothing changed, just a different name.</p>
<p>Real bloggers though should go for independence, clarity, fresh content. Not necessarily news, but content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Netscape.com is Out of BETA by Darren McLaughlin</title>
		<link>http://www.bloglogic.net/2006/06/29/netscapecom-is-out-of-beta/#comment-716</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren McLaughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 21:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloglogic.net/2006/06/29/netscapecom-is-out-of-beta/#comment-716</guid>
		<description>I actually followed a link in from Netscape, which I just tried.  It looks pretty good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually followed a link in from Netscape, which I just tried.  It looks pretty good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on No Holds Barred: AOL/WIN Blatently Rips Off Digg.com by Netscape.com is Out of BETA - Bloglogic.net</title>
		<link>http://www.bloglogic.net/2006/06/15/no-holds-barred-aolwin-blatently-rips-off-diggcom/#comment-710</link>
		<dc:creator>Netscape.com is Out of BETA - Bloglogic.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 17:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloglogic.net/2006/06/15/no-holds-barred-aolwin-blatently-rips-off-diggcom/#comment-710</guid>
		<description>[...] Now, after my previous rant about JC and his new baby, let&#8217;s see if I can&#8217;t get Bloglogic.net on the front page - without getting edited into oblivion. *Grin* [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now, after my previous rant about JC and his new baby, let&#8217;s see if I can&#8217;t get Bloglogic.net on the front page - without getting edited into oblivion. *Grin* [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who Needs Venture Capital? by Performancing Partners - New Blogs Ad Network Coming Soon - Bloglogic.net</title>
		<link>http://www.bloglogic.net/2006/06/28/who-needs-venture-capital/#comment-707</link>
		<dc:creator>Performancing Partners - New Blogs Ad Network Coming Soon - Bloglogic.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloglogic.net/2006/06/28/who-needs-venture-capital/#comment-707</guid>
		<description>[...] Move over Blogads, Chitika and Google Adsense, there&#8217;s a new ad network called Performancing Partners coming soon! Remember yesterday when I gave my shortlist of blog related companies that deserve a round of seed funding? Here&#8217;s why Performancing is on that list:  * Partners mixes images and text in a smart way to give both publishers and advertisers the best of both worlds [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Move over Blogads, Chitika and Google Adsense, there&#8217;s a new ad network called Performancing Partners coming soon! Remember yesterday when I gave my shortlist of blog related companies that deserve a round of seed funding? Here&#8217;s why Performancing is on that list:  * Partners mixes images and text in a smart way to give both publishers and advertisers the best of both worlds [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Big Lies about Blogging by Ann Handley</title>
		<link>http://www.bloglogic.net/2006/06/28/big-lies-about-blogging/#comment-706</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Handley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 13:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloglogic.net/2006/06/28/big-lies-about-blogging/#comment-706</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the flag, Paul. *Love* the accompanying graphic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the flag, Paul. *Love* the accompanying graphic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lifehacker 2.0 Comment Slam by HART (1-800-HART)</title>
		<link>http://www.bloglogic.net/2006/06/28/lifehacker-20-comment-slam/#comment-701</link>
		<dc:creator>HART (1-800-HART)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 03:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloglogic.net/2006/06/28/lifehacker-20-comment-slam/#comment-701</guid>
		<description>The page that you linked above was unreadable using I.E.v7 .. until the 5th comment down .. I'd let them know - but I continue to refuse to register to be able to comment on that blog. I think that's wrong.

PS: looking good here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The page that you linked above was unreadable using I.E.v7 .. until the 5th comment down .. I&#8217;d let them know - but I continue to refuse to register to be able to comment on that blog. I think that&#8217;s wrong.</p>
<p>PS: looking good here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lifehacker 2.0 Comment Slam by Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.bloglogic.net/2006/06/28/lifehacker-20-comment-slam/#comment-699</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 18:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloglogic.net/2006/06/28/lifehacker-20-comment-slam/#comment-699</guid>
		<description>I'm still rubbing my eyes Mike, but yeah, it's getting lots of feedback. Hopefully the powers that be over there take notes on all that constructive criticism and refer to them before their next wave of site-revamping.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still rubbing my eyes Mike, but yeah, it&#8217;s getting lots of feedback. Hopefully the powers that be over there take notes on all that constructive criticism and refer to them before their next wave of site-revamping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lifehacker 2.0 Comment Slam by Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.bloglogic.net/2006/06/28/lifehacker-20-comment-slam/#comment-698</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 18:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloglogic.net/2006/06/28/lifehacker-20-comment-slam/#comment-698</guid>
		<description>I kinda like the new design at Lifehacker....anything that makes the masses pissy !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kinda like the new design at Lifehacker&#8230;.anything that makes the masses pissy !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Digg Founder Kevin Rose one of CNN&#8217;s &#8220;50 People Who Matter Now&#8221; by Cary</title>
		<link>http://www.bloglogic.net/2006/06/26/digg-founder-kevin-rose-on-cnns-list/#comment-686</link>
		<dc:creator>Cary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 14:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloglogic.net/2006/06/26/digg-founder-kevin-rose-on-cnns-list/#comment-686</guid>
		<description>Paul... your redesign of Bloglogic is absolutely outstanding :)

Congrats!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul&#8230; your redesign of Bloglogic is absolutely outstanding <img src='http://www.bloglogic.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Congrats!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
